Sunday, June 21, 2009

Defining "Defining Experiences"

And the title is....

The title of a book or movie or -- as here -- a blog, should grab your attention, and then make a stab at answering the question: "What's it about?" I've tried to do both, also sneaking in a little word play.

The first aim worked, apparently, since you are here (unless you are here only as a dutiful daughter or a faithful friend).

As for the "about" question: Playing with words is part of what it's about, but even more, it is about working with words. I'm referring to the work that determines whether certain words should be admitted into dictionaries and, if they are let in, how much they should be pampered, or pretty much left to fend for themselves. That's the main reason the title refers to "defining" -- this blog will deal with defining, as in creating dictionaries, but also many other experiences that involve "doing definition."

So, the word play is...

"Defining Experiences" as a title can be understood several ways, and that's the fun of it.

"Defining" could be read as an adjective -- describing certain experiences as having lasting significance. That is probably the way you first perceived this "collocation" (i.e., two or more words typically used together, like "defining experiences" or "defining moments") That's not how I mainly mean it here, but I might give that sense of it a post, eventually.

Or, "defining" could be a noun -- the act or experience of defining -- which is the main way I intend the expression here.

And a third possibility: "defining" could be a verb, referring to applying the act, in this case, to the word, "experiences". At some time I might do a post on definitions of the word "experiences," but that's not for now.

Working with words is intriguing because...

I liked that title precisely because it self-exemplifies a fundamental feature of words and phrases that is not well-recognized for its sociological significance: Most words, alone and in phrases, have multiple meanings -- multitudes, in fact, if we consider fine shadings that apply in each individual conversation or document where words and phrases are performing their service.

Given that reality, a major goal of the considerable work put into dictionaries (more precisely, a goal of the professionals who write most dictionaries) is a valiant effort but is, in a deep sense, impossible to achieve. Dictionary-writers attempt in vain to encompass and pin down some limited number of definitions (a separate matter from deciding whether to include words to be defined). And dictionary-users in turn seek what is essentially unreachable -- general definitions that precisely apply to the unique situations where they encountered particular words, or plan to use them.

From that last paragraph -- which implies that dictionaries are cultural products that engage a broad range of users and producers -- lots of questions about language and society spring up. This blog aims to inform and entertain partly by clarifying and dealing with those questions.

(Did I mention that I am a sociologist and that's the perspective that will suffuse this blog?)

News reports about dictionaries and defining???

Yes, the media do pay attention -- rarely -- to these kinds of questions. So along the way, I'll throw in news and op-ed items involving dictionaries and "social defining."

There's more to explain, but...

This is enough, I hope, as a start to convey the thrust of this blog. Let me know if it's not clear -- or if you disagree (or agree) with the little bit of information I've shared so far.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%







12 comments:

  1. Super concept. Looking forward to following your blog.

    My contribution for the day: I am fascinated by the Urban Dictionary which I learned about the first time from the paper you gave me back in April. (I did read it on the plane...just never got around to sending you some comments.) I hadn't thought about UD much until I heard a bit on the news the other day, how "Hiking in Appalachia" was recently added to the UD as a term to define having an extramarital affair. The UD is updated continuously and can be found at http://www.urbandictionary.com/.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for a meaty comment.

    Yes, Urban Dictionary is a blast! Some people question if it's "really" a dictionary, but that just highlights a main point of this blog: that definitions are made by a social process, become legitimate (or not), and change along with other social changes.

    According to alexa.comm's web popularity measures, Urban Dictionary ranks quite high, slightly outpacing "Wiktionary." Almost half of Urban D's users are not in the USA.

    I'll have lots to say about Urban D. in future posts. I see it as a "leading indicator" of new kinds of community on the Web, where taking charge of defining terms relates to identity issues.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The blog was superbly defined and my experience as a reader was anticipatory. Would you care to look at defining the social meaning of the expression, "yes no" and, "no yes"? When I hear this combination in friendly conversation I sense people are in agreement but can't simply say, "yes". Are we having trouble defining our opinions? You likely have many words to define and I'll take a look at the UD in the meantime....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Ted - although you emailed having trouble leaving a comment, obviously you succeeded!

    My aim is not to "do definitions" but to look at how people create, debate, and use linguistic expressions. In fact, your comment does just that very well -- technically, you have focused on the "pragmatics" of language (i.e., how it functions in social interaction) more than the semantics of the words.

    As to the specific intriguing phrases --"yes-no""no-yes" -- that is used in spoken rather than written language. As linguists increasingly are able to analyze large bodies of digitized conversation (previously relied more on written samples), someone will probably tackle such phrases.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Corinne thank you for a thoughtful place to consider language in a sociological framework. I always enjoy logging on!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you very much for sharing this amazing knowledge with us. It appears like you have done a lot of hard effort to collect such amazing information. Avid Sibelius Ultimate Crack

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello, I Am Mari. Nice Content. I value the information you provide. Your website's overall appearance, let alone what it accomplishes, is very remarkable. https://softhound.net/substance-alchemist/

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's a big relief to have finally discovered someone who can express themselves so clearly. https://cracksir.com/edius-pro-9-55-crack/

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is a fantastic blog.
    https://crackspick.com/topaz-gigapixel-ai-latest-version/

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'd like to see many more submissions from you in the future.
    So many people love your software. It's an honor to see your work.https://hdlicense.net/listary-pro-crack/

    ReplyDelete
  11. Currently, I am browsing this websiteand reading very informative content here at this site, which I got from a friendLansweeper

    ReplyDelete